Students Discussion--"Evangelism--Why Bother...?"
I'm glad this was a topic of discussion after I left. It is very important that we settle this issue once and for all.
While it is true that God is sovereign in His electing grace, it is also true that he has ordained the method of drawing His people to Himself. We are never called upon to make inferences on God's sovereignty in election ("if God is sovereign in election,.. then we needn't bother"). When people do this they step into the dangerous heresy of hyper-Calvinism. Here is a helpful chart comparing Calvinism to Arminianism and hyper-Calvinism.
Scripture clearly teaches that God has chosen to use people as his instruments of the Great Commission:
And he said to them, "Go into all the world and proclaim the gospel to the whole creation --Mark 16:15 ESV
Go therefore and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit... --Matthew 28:19 ESV
But how are they to call on him in whom they have not believed? And how are they to believe in him of whom they have never heard? And how are they to hear without someone preaching? --Romans 10:14 ESV
For since, in the wisdom of God, the world did not know God through wisdom, it pleased God through the folly of what we preach to save those who believe. --1 Corinthians 1:21 ESV
So what difference does God's sovereignty in election make? Tons! Because we know that God is in total control:
- We know that we are called to be faithful rather than successful (no guilt if the person doesn't believe). We don't have to resort to gimmicks, trickery, or worldly salesmanship!
- We can know that we are merely instruments in the hand of God and can just watch in awe as He uses us.
- We can know that it isn't a waste of time to pray for people's salvation (non-Calvinists are asking God to do what they claim He would never do... impose His saving will on people)
Why bother? --It is the most amazing privilege you can imagine. It is active love motivated by gratitude for God's grace. It is active obedience motivated by a reverent fear of the Holy God who holds all things in his hands!
"If you love me, you will keep my commandments. Jesus Christ, quoted by John in his gospel, Ch.14:15 ESV
Remember the Great Commission quoted above? In terms of the commandments of God -- It's a biggy!
The question isn't "why bother?" it's "what are you waiting for?"
-------------------------------
Another related error goes this way "if God is only going to save the elect, then how can/do we know who..."
We don't and we are never told to even try! We are told to faithfully preach the gospel to all. God will take care of the rest.
Rule of Thumb: Don't make inferences (if ... then...) based on God's sovereignty (unless it is: if God is sovereign, then I can take comfort/stand in awe ...). Making wrong inferences like these are easy to recognize because they violate the clear teachings of our call to obedience and faithfulness to God.
Labels: Student Questions


4 Comments:
Its good to know this information about the scripture, but it seems to be the same information over and over. The question isn't "WHY should we evangelise" or "Is it RIGHT to evangelise" Because we all understand that we are appointed to do so by scripture, the question IS, "Should we be EXPECTED to evangelise."
This means assuming that its mandatory to one's salvation to approach a freind or stranger and tell them that everything they believe is a lie.
Of course we SHOULD do it, and its GOOD to do it, but wouldnt you feel wrong walking up to a Muslim or a Mormon and telling them that the faith they have based their entire lives on is completely farse?
It doesn't exactly seem like the right thing to do.
Yes.
You bring up an interesting distinction that it never occurred to me to address. Just because God's Word tells us to (WHY) and commands us to (RIGHT), are we EXPECTED to.
Witnesses testify. Ambassadors promote the interests of their commissioner. These are things that Christians ARE. We DO what we ARE.
"This means assuming that it is madatory to one's salvation to approach a friend or stranger and tell them that everything they believe is wrong."
This an interesting interpretation of evangelim implying rudeness. Hopefully we can change this perception in the coming weeks. Humility and graciousness need to characterize our evangelism.
"Of course we SHOULD ... it's GOOD .., but wouldn't it feel wrong ..."
Here we get to the heart of the issue: truth versus feelings.
When truth and feelings oppose each other, which must adjust?
Upon what basis does it feel wrong? Discomfort?
Does it help to understand the true condition of Mormons and Muslims? However kind, sincere, and dedicated to their faith they may be, *they have been lied to by a false prophet, believed a false gospel, and trust in a false God that cannot save them. On judgement day they (apart from Christ) will hear "depart from me, I never knew you."
Which is weightier, our discomfort today or the "why didn't you tell me?" discomfort of that day? (I know this is a tough question and I am convicted as I ask it.)
*My saying this doesn't make it so. Follow these links on Mormonism and Islam to start learning if what I've said is true.
"... mandatory to one's salvation..."
I failed to comment on this important statement. It confuses cause and effect. We don't witness to be saved, we witness because we are saved.
Here are links to the relocated pages for Mormonism and Islam.
Post a Comment
<< Home